search icon
      blog search icon

      Netflix vs IBM: A Comparative Analysis of Tech Giants

      By Wasim Omar

      Published on

      December 21, 2023

      12:21 PM UTC

      Netflix vs IBM: A Comparative Analysis of Tech Giants

      For the typical tech investor, the juxtaposition of tech titans can be as fascinating as it is instructive. Enter the arena where the streaming giant Netflix Inc. (NFLX) and the venerable technology behemoth International Business Machines (IBM) stand as starkly distinct players.

      Netflix, boasting 15 years of strategic investments and relentless innovation, has carved out a formidable niche in the streaming domain, amassing over 250 million global subscribers.

      With a share price of almost $490, Netflix’s unique market position and the so-called “Netflix effect” pose intriguing questions about sustained profitability.

      On the other side of the spectrum, IBM, renowned as Big Blue, is a multinational powerhouse in computer hardware, software, and consulting services, with a sprawling presence in 175 countries.

      It has established itself as a crucial component of the global semiconductor set-up, with a number of industries dependent on its output.

      This comparison between Netflix vs IBM in 2023 is a study in contrasts between two top US stocks, making it a particularly compelling analysis for stock market participants.

      On one side, we have Netflix, a streaming giant with 15 years of strategic investments. Conversely, IBM stands as a technology colossus with a rich history and a global presence in computer hardware, software, and consulting.

      As we embark on this comparative journey between Netflix vs IBM, the convergence of these vastly different yet innovative forces sparks curiosity about the trajectories that lie ahead in the ever-evolving landscape of the stock market.

      Business Comparison

      Netflix vs IBM operate in vastly different sectors, each with unique business models and challenges.

      Netflix, a streaming giant, relies on a delicate balance between increasing memberships, boosting average revenue per member, and managing content costs.

      The profitability of streaming hinges on generating more revenue from memberships than the substantial costs of content creation and licensing.

      This industry faces a significant hurdle—the chicken-egg problem—where streaming platforms must invest heavily in content to attract members, often leading to initial losses.

      Contrastingly, IBM, as a leader in IT services, confronts challenges in the evolving landscape of cloud computing and open-source software. The shift towards cloud services threatens IBM’s once solid customer switching costs.

      While IBM’s interconnected offerings, spanning consulting, outsourcing, hardware, software, and cloud services, have historically provided a competitive edge, the rise of cloud agnosticism and increased flexibility in software choices erodes this advantage.

      IBM also grapples with the integration of Red Hat, facing potential threats to its competitive position in the rapidly evolving cloud market.

      Understanding these distinct business models is crucial for investors navigating the diverse landscapes of streaming and IT services to make informed decisions in the dynamic market of 2023.

      Valuation Comparison

      In comparing Netflix vs IBM valuations, it’s evident that Netflix commands a higher premium in the market.

      Netflix’s stock, trading above the peer group average, reflects its status as a growth stock. With a 5.5x EV/Sales ratio, surpassing the peer group’s 3.3x, and a P/E ratio of 28.7x compared to the peer group’s 39.8x, the higher valuation is justified.

      The recent subscriber growth underscores Netflix’s pricing power and industry dominance, making it an attractive investment. Wall Street echoes this sentiment, with 29 buy ratings out of 44 analysts, reinforcing optimism with a median sell-side price target of $475.

      Conversely, IBM presents a contrasting picture, trading at a lower multiple compared to its peers. With an EV/Sales ratio of 2.6 for 2024, notably lower than the peer group’s 5.2x, and a P/E ratio of 14.5 compared to the group’s 24.3x, IBM appears undervalued.

      However, caution is advised, as analysts recommend staying on the sidelines. Wall Street, with a neutral stance, offers a modest upside potential of 1%, signaling limited room for growth.

      While IBM may seem undervalued, the lack of near-term catalysts and an uncertain macro environment suggest a cautious approach, making Netflix the more compelling choice for investors seeking growth.

      Final Takeaway

      Netflix appears as a growth powerhouse with a high valuation, driven by strategic investments and market dominance. In contrast, IBM, though undervalued, faces challenges in the evolving IT landscape.

      Despite caution for IBM due to a lack of catalysts, Netflix emerges as the more compelling choice for growth-seeking investors in 2023 between Netflix vs IBM.

      More From Stocks telegraph